FEATURES OF DETECTING ACADEMIC IMAGE PLAGIARISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26906/SUNZ.2025.3.055Keywords:
academic integrity, academic image plagiarism, visual content, image manipulation, academic documentsAbstract
The rapid growth of visual content in academic documents highlights the issue of detecting academic image plagiarism. Unlike textual plagiarism, which is effectively identified by modern systems, visual plagiarism remains a challen ging task due to the diversity of its manifestations and the potential for manipulation. The aim of this work is to analyze existing approaches to image recognition and comparison for detecting academic plagiarism and to identify key features. The study examines computer vision algorithms, deep learning models, and other technologies for analyzing textual elements within images. A classification of visual plagiarism forms is proposed, including exact copying, affine transformations, semantic duplication, and image generation. The main features are identified: extensive possibilities for manipulation and specific forms of visual content representation, lack of a global image database, difficulty in extracting non-textual content, and legal restrictions on access to full texts. Conclusions: Image analysis for detecting academic plagiarism remains a relevant and promising research direction, which can be implemented through the following avenues: improving modification detection algorithms and integrating visual analysis into textual plagiarism detection systems, creating image repositories, and ensuring the availability of informational tools for experts and researchers.Downloads
References
1. Eisa T. A. E. Plagiarism detection of figure images in scientific publications. International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management. 2022. Vol. 14, no. 1. P. 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijdmmm.2022.10046101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJDMMM.2022.10046101
2. Saliba, T., Rotzinger, D. Figure plagiarism and manipulation, an under-recognised problem in academia. Eur Radiol. 2025. Vol. 35, 4518–4521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11426-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11426-2
3. Meuschke N. Analyzing Non-Textual Content Elements to Detect Academic Plagiarism. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42062-8
4. Parmar S., Jain B. VIBRANT-WALK: An algorithm to detect plagiarism of figures in academic papers. Expert Systems with Applications. 2024. P. 124251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124251
5. Ibrahin A. S. B., Khalifa O. O., Ahmed D. E. M. Plagiarism Detection of Images. 2020 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia, 27–29 September 2020. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/scored50371.2020.9250940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SCOReD50371.2020.9250940
6. Eisa T. A. E., Salim N., Abdelmaboud A. Content-Based Scientific Figure Plagiarism Detection Using Semantic Mapping. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham, 2019. P. 420–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33582-3_40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33582-3_40
7. Eisa T. A. E., Salim N., Alzahrani S. Figure plagiarism detection based on textual features representation. 2017 6th ICT International Student Project Conference (ICT-ISPC), Johor, Malaysia, 23–24 May 2017. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ictispc.2017.8075305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT-ISPC.2017.8075305
8. Eisa T., Salim N., Alzahrani S. Figure Plagiarism Detection Using Content-Based Features. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Singapore, 2017. P. 17–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3779-5_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3779-5_3
9. Mazaheri, G., Avila, K. U., & Roy-Chowdhury, A. K. Learning to identify image manipulations in scientific publications. 2021. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.01874.
10. Mijatović, A., Žuljević, M. F., Ursić, L., Bralić, N., Vuković, M., Roguljić, M., & Marušić, A. How good are medical students and researchers in detecting duplications in digital images from research articles: a cross-sectional survey. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2025. Vol. 10(1), 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00172-0
11. Duszejko, P., Walczyna, T., & Piotrowski, Z. (2025). Detection of Manipulations in Digital Images: A Review of Passive and Active Methods Utilizing Deep Learning. Applied Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15(2), 881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020881
12. JOSHI, Parag Mulendra; LIU, Sam. Web document text and images extraction using DOM analysis and natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM symposium on Document engineering. 2009. p. 218-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1600193.1600241
13. Bhowmik, S., Sarkar, R., Nasipuri, M., & Doermann, D. Text and non-text separation in offline document images: a survey. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR). 2018. 21(1-2), 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10032-018-0296-z
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuliia Hlavcheva, Maksym Glavchev

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.